![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||
| SQA09 - Supporting Assessments of Information Structures |
LQS09 - Prüfungen der Informationsstrukturen unterstützen
1 Allocation to V-Model and Methods Allocation
QA4.1 - Determination of Assessability
QA4.2 - Assessment of the Content of the Product
Method
2 Brief Characteristics
3 Requirements
3.1 Requirements for Interfaces
| SQA09.I.1 | Granularity | The exchange of control parameters with SWFM01 - Workflow Management is possible for individual closed function packages of the tool by means of a disclosed, documented interface. |
3.2 Requirements for the Methods Support
| SQA09.M.1 | STAT - Static Analysis | |
| SQA09.M.1.1 | ER - E/R Modeling | |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1 | Consistency Check | |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1.1 | Entity types and functions | It is possible to list the entity types existing in the E/R models of the incoming and outgoing data flows of a process but not in the E/R model of the process. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1.2 | Attributes and functions | It is possible to list the attributes existing in E/R models of incoming and outgoing data flows of a process but not in the E/R model of the process. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1.3 | Entity types and data store | It is possible to list the entity types existing in E/R models of incoming and outgoing data flows of a data store but not in the E/R model of the data store. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1.4 | Attributes and data store | It is possible to list the attributes existing in E/R models of incoming and outgoing data flows of a data store but not in the E/R model of a data store. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1.5 | Entity types with the same primary keys |
It is possible to list entity types with the same primary key. All attributes depending on a key should be combined in an entity. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1.6 | Attributes with the same name |
It is possible to list attributes having the same name in different entity types. Attributes with the same name can refer to redundantly defined attributes. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1.7 | Aggregations and specializations | |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1.7.1 | Matching attributes in entity subtypes and its corresponding supertype |
It is possible to list entity subtypes the attributes of which do not differ from its supertype. If the attributes are the same, the entity subtype and its supertype are identical. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1.7.2 | Matching attributes in several entity subtypes |
It is possible to receive information about matching attributes in several entity subtypes. Matching attributes in several entity subtypes may point out that the attribute should be entered in the supertype. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1.7.3 | Matching relationships in several entity subtypes |
It is possible to receive information about matching relationships in several entity subtypes. Matching relationships in several entity subtypes may point out that the relationship should be entered in the supertype. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1.7.4 | Single entity subtypes |
It is possible to list entity type hierarchies consisting of only one entity subtype. An entity type hierarchy that only consists of one entity subtype may be incomplete or incorrect. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1.8 | Assessment of redundancy |
It is possible to list several 1:N relationships between two entity types. Several 1:N relationships between two entity types can point to the fact that a relationship is redundant. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1.9 | Assessment with regard to 1:1 relationships |
It is possible to list 1:1 relationships between two entity types. 1:1 relationships between two entity types can point to the fact that the two entity types ought to be combined. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1.10 | Isolated entity types | |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1.10.1 | Overall model | It is possible to list entity types existing in the overall model but not existing in any of the partial data models. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.1.10.2 | Partial model | It is possible to list entity types to which no relationships are allocated. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.2 | Assessment of conventions | |
| SQA09.M.1.1.2.1 | Project standards | It is possible to define the conventions to be assessed with regard to individual projects. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.2.2 | Naming conventions | It is possible to assess naming conventions. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.2.3 | Limitations | It is possible to assess size and complexity limitations. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.2.4 | Layout conventions | It is possible to assess layout conventions. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.2.5 | Means of representation | It is possible to assess commitments to certain representation types. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.3 | Assessment of Completeness | |
| SQA09.M.1.1.3.1 | Missing data type | It is possible to list attributes to which no data type has been allocated. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.3.2 | Missing range | It is possible to list attributes to which no value range has been allocated. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.3.3 | Missing attributes | It is possible to list entity types to which no attributes have been allocated. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.3.4 | Missing keys | It is possible to list entity types to which no key has been allocated. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.4 | Completeness of the description | It is possible to generate a list of all objects for which no descriptions exist. |
| SQA09.M.1.1.5 | Adaptation | Individually adapted forms of representation for the object to be assessed are taken into consideration during the assessment. |
| SQA09.M.1.2 | ELH - Entity Life History | |
| SQA09.M.1.2.1 | Assessment of completeness | |
| SQA09.M.1.2.1.1 | Missing state diagrams | It is possible to list all entity types to which no state diagram has been allocated. |
| SQA09.M.1.2.1.2 | Missing state changing events | It is possible to list all state changes to which no state changing event has been allocated. |
| SQA09.M.1.2.1.3 | Missing integrity conditions | It is possible to list all entity types together with the corresponding state changes for which no integrity conditions have been entered. |
| SQA09.M.1.2.2 | Assessment of conventions | |
| SQA09.M.1.2.2.1 | Project standards | It is possible to define the conventions to be assessed with regard to individual projects. |
| SQA09.M.1.2.2.2 | Naming conventions | It is possible to assess naming conventions. |
| SQA09.M.1.2.2.3 | Limitations | It is possible to assess size and complexity limitations. |
| SQA09.M.1.2.2.4 | Layout conventions | It is possible to assess layout conventions. |
| SQA09.M.1.2.2.5 | Means of representation | It is possible to assess commitments to certain representation types. |
| SQA09.M.1.2.3 | Completeness of description | It is possible to generate a list of all objects for which no descriptions exist. |
| SQA09.M.1.2.4 | Adaptation | Individually adapted forms of representation for the object to be assessed are taken into consideration during the assessment. |
| SQA09.M.1.3 | NORM - Normalization | |
| SQA09.M.1.3.1 | Assessment of consistency | |
| SQA09.M.1.3.1.1 | First normal form | It is possible to list the non-key attributes that are not functionally dependent on the key. |
| SQA09.M.1.3.1.2 | Second normal form | It is possible to list the non-key attributes that are functionally dependent on a subkey. |
| SQA09.M.1.3.1.3 | Third normal form | It is possible to list the non-key attributes that are transitively dependent on each other. |
| SQA09.M.1.3.2 | Assessment of conventions | |
| SQA09.M.1.3.2.1 | Project standards | It is possible to define the conventions to be assessed with regard to individual projects. |
| SQA09.M.1.3.2.2 | Naming conventions | It is possible to assess naming conventions. |
| SQA09.M.1.3.2.3 | Limitations | It is possible to assess size and complexity limitations. |
| SQA09.M.1.3.2.4 | Layout conventions | It is possible to assess layout conventions. |
| SQA09.M.1.3.2.5 | Means of representation | It is possible to assess commitments to certain representation types. |
3.3 Requirements for Functions
| SQA09.F.1 | Delimitation of to the assessment | It is possible to delimit size and extent of the assessment to selectable characteristics. |
| SQA09.F.2 | Procedural language |
By means of a procedural language it is possible to check other individual assessment criteria. A procedural language offers an automatic assessment of further individual assessment criteria. |
| SQA09.F.3 | Logging |
It is possible to get the results of the assessment logged. In this case, "logging" refers to a protocol of all data that might be utilized for later documentation of the assessment (e. g. test cases, expected results, actual results, messages) and not, however, to an editing of the documentation in the sense of actual assessment protocols. |
3.4 Other Requirements
| SQA09.O.1 | Procedural command language | The tool has a procedural command language that can be applied by the user to generate and run macros or procedures. |
| SQA09.O.2 | Complexity | There is no limitation of the complexity caused by the tool itself. |
| SQA09.O.3 | Background |
Assessments run in the background mode unless an assessment in the foreground mode has been explicitly requested. Since an assessment may take some time it is not necessary to wait for the end of the processing when in the background mode, i. e. other tasks can be realized in the meantime. |
| SQA09.O.4 | End signal |
The end of an assessment is signaled. This signal may be acoustic (e. g. by means of a beep) or optic (e. g. by means of a special window with a corresponding message). |
| SQA09.O.5 | Invariance | Applying the tool does not change the object to be assessed. |
![]() |
![]() |
GDPA Online
Last Updated 01.Jan.2002
Updated by Webmaster
Last Revised 01.Jan.2002
Revised by Webmaster
![]() |