2000 |
---|
Reference |
/Sivan, 2000/ Knowledge Age Standards: A Brief Introduction to Their Dimensions
|
Definition/ Use |
Dimension 1: Level |
Dimension 2: Purpose |
Dimension 3: Effect |
Dimension 4: Sponsor |
Dimension 5: Stage |
Individual
| Simplification
| Constructive
| Devoid
| Missing
Organisational
| Communication
| Positive
| Nonsponsored
| Emerging
Associational
| Harmonisation
| Unknown
| Unisponsored
| Existing
National
| Protection
| Negative
| Multisponsored
| Declining
Multinational
| Valuation
| Destructive
| Mandated
| Dying
| | | | |
|
1999 |
---|
Reference |
/Choh, 1999a/ Governance Mechanisms of Standard-Making in the Information Technology
|
Definition/ Use |
We can focus on a relationship between the governance mechanisms and standards while abstracted from each sector's industrial configuration. In the information technology industry, five distinctive governance mechanisms on standardisation have been identified, the state, community, association, network, and market. Each governance mechanisms has its own principles in solving the conflict between collective and private interests.
The market mechanism is guided by the principle of competition in the context of maximisation of self-interest. The guiding principle of the network mechanism is voluntary cooperation in the market; organised consensus is the guiding principle of the association mechanism. The state's coordinating capacity is based on its legitimate coercion in the industry. And, the community exercises its coordination effects in the industry with voluntary contributions based on openess.
Governance mode |
Mechanisms |
Property Relations of Technology |
Standards Outcome |
The state
| Coercive impose
| Public good
| Regulatory standards
Community
| Normative impose based on voluntary contribution
| Public good
| Voluntary standards
Association
| Pragmatic consensus
| Industry quasi-public good
| Formal standards
Network
| Self-interest agreement
| Proprietary technology
| Anticipatory standards
Market
| Self-interest non-agreement
| Proprietary technology
| De facto standards
| | | | |
|
2000 |
---|
Reference |
/Wende, 1999/ Experiences and Positions of the DIN IT Standards Committee
|
Definition/ Use |
Source Platform |
Level of Consensus |
Openness, Transparency, Procedures |
Motivation of Members |
Time/ Effort |
Deliverable |
single companies (MS; SUN,...)
| the company
| closed, internal rules
| homogeneous
| low
| proprietary specification
consortia (W3C; ECMA,...)
| members (companies)
| open for paying members (companies), published rules
| homogeneous
| low
| specification (standard)
Association (IEEE; VDE,...)
| members (individual experts)
| open for paying members (individuals), published rules
| more or less homogeneous
| medium
| specification standard
Standard bodies (IISI; CEN, DIN)
| all interested parties, public, delegation principle
| open for all interested parties, publicly accepted and published rules, consensus-based process
| in-homogeneous, diffuse
| high
| Norm, formal standard
Internet (IETF)
| all interested individuals with internet access
| open for the internet community, published rules
| more or less homogeneous
| low
| specification standard
| | | | |
|